Discourse Markers

Discourse markers (words like 'however', 'although' and 'Nevertheless') are referred to more commonly as 'linking words' and 'linking phrases', or 'sentence connectors'. They may be described as the 'glue' that binds together a piece of writing, making the different parts of the text 'stick together'. They are used less frequently in speech, unless the speech is very formal.

Without sufficient discourse markers in a piece of writing, a text would not seem logically constructed and the connections between the different sentences and paragraphs would not be obvious.

Care must also be taken, however, to avoid over-use of discourse markers. Using too many of them, or using them unnecessarily, can make a piece of writing sound too heavy and 'artificial'. They are important, but must only be used when necessary.

Key advice

4. Discourse markers in a sample passage of academic English

What are the different discourse markers that can be used?

There are many discourse markers that express different relationships between ideas. The most common types of relationship between ideas, and the sentence connectors that are most often used to express these relationships, are given in the table below. The discourse markers in the table are generally used at the start of a phrase or clause. (a clause is a minimal grammatical structure that has meaning in its own right, and consists of a subject and verb, and often an object too). Sentence connectors do not always begin a completely new sentence; they may be separated from the previous idea with a semi-colon.

Note that there are two particular features of the sentence connectors indicated below:

Type of relationship: Adding something

Sentence connectors

Moreover; In addition; Additionally; Further; Further to this; Also; Besides; What is more.

Position within clause/sentence

Type of relationship: Making a contrast between two separate things, people, ideas, etc.

Sentence connectors

However; On the other hand; In contrast; Yet.

Position within clause/sentence

Type of relationship: Making an unexpected contrast (concession)

Sentence connectors

Although; Even though; Despite the fact that; In spite of the fact that; Regardless of the fact that.

Position within clause/sentence

Starts a second/ subordinate clause

Type of relationship: Saying why something is the case

Sentence connectors

Because; Since; As; Insofar as.

Position within clause/sentence

Starts a second/ subordinate clause

Type of relationship: Saying what the result of something is

Sentence connectors

Therefore; Consequently; In consequence; As a result; Accordingly; Hence; Thus; For this reason; Because of this.

Position within clause/sentence

Type of relationship: Expressing a condition

Sentence connectors

If; In the event of; As long as. ; So long as. ; Provided that. ; Assuming that. ; Given that.

Position within clause/sentence

Starts a second/ subordinate clause

Type of relationship: Making what you say stronger

Sentence connectors

On the contrary; As a matter of fact; In fact; Indeed.

Position within clause/sentence

How can sentence connectors be replaced in order to increase variety in writing?

In your writing, you will want to spend some time ensuring that your work has a sense of variety. In order to do this, you might think of the following:

How are paragraphs linked together?

In much the same way that ideas within a paragraph are linked, a new paragraph must be linked in some way with the previous one. This, too, necessitates the use of discourse markers.

In the table below are some different ways in which the opening of a paragraph can link back to what has happened before. The three basic types of paragraph-paragraph relationship are : reinforcement of idea; contrast of ideas; and concession. Indicating these relationships builds a 'bridge' between paragraphs and makes reading the text easier.

Relationship with previous paragraph: Reinforcement of idea

Possible linguistic formula

a) A further example of this phenomenon can be seen in Foucault's work.

b) Jones (1999) further demonstrates this point in his most recent research.

Relationship with previous paragraph: Contrast of ideas

Possible linguistic formula

a) Jones, meanwhile/on the other hand, expresses this notion as 'self-defence'.

b) This argument is not, however, accepted by all critics. For instance, Smith (1999) holds that.

Relationship with previous paragraph: Concession

Possible linguistic formula

a) Although the ideas of Jones (1999) are interesting and useful, they do not take account of the growing problems of identity theft.

b) While Roberts (2006) emphasises the importance of Foucault's notion of the panopticon, the opposite view is held by other commentators. For example.

In your own writing, it is useful to consider the following points:

Do my paragraphs serve a definite purpose?

What is the exact link between the paragraph I have written and the previous paragraph? Is that link clear?

Are my paragraphs laid out strategically, in order to help me to organise my materials to best effect?