Class III cavity preparation in primary anterior teeth: in vitro retention comparison of conventional and modified forms

Management of mild to moderate caries in primary anterior teeth is still a problem. Presently, class III composite restorations in primary teeth have inadequate retention. The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyze the influence of the design of modified class III cavity preparation on the retention of the restoration when compared to that of the conventional class III preparation. Thirty extracted human primary maxillary central incisors were divided into two groups of 15 teeth each. In one group, the conventional (triangular) class III design was prepared. The second group, the modified class III design, was prepared by adding to the conventional form, 0.5 mm. labial reduction on the labial tooth surface. The dentinal bonding agent, Amalgambond, was applied to 30 teeth according to instructions of manufacturer. The composite resin, Herculite XRV, was inserted into each preparation. All samples were mounted in plastic molds and thermocycled. The samples were tested with Instron testing machine until restoration failure. Results showed that the mean failure load of modified class III restoration group (92.19 +/- 13.6 N) was significantly higher from that of conventional class III preparation group (45.61 +/- 9.8 N) as tested by Student's independent t-test (P < 0.001).

Similar articles

Roberts HW, Hermesch CB, Charlton DG. Roberts HW, et al. Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):270-3. Oper Dent. 2000. PMID: 11203830

Ferdianakis K, White GE. Ferdianakis K, et al. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1999 Spring;23(3):201-16. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1999. PMID: 10686867

Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Frencken JE, van't Hof M. Eden E, et al. Am J Dent. 2006 Dec;19(6):359-63. Am J Dent. 2006. PMID: 17212078 Clinical Trial.

Muhlbauer JA, Dunn WJ, Roberts HW, Murchison DF. Muhlbauer JA, et al. Oper Dent. 2002 May-Jun;27(3):284-8. Oper Dent. 2002. PMID: 12022461 Clinical Trial.

Jahn KR, Zuhrt R. Jahn KR, et al. Stomatol DDR. 1990 May;40(5):223-6. Stomatol DDR. 1990. PMID: 2270582 Review. German.

Cited by

Aslaminabadi N, Halimi Tabrizi Z, Golsanamlou O, Estaki Z, Jamali Z. Aslaminabadi N, et al. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022 Spring;16(2):123-129. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2022.021. Epub 2022 Oct 15. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022. PMID: 36561382 Free PMC article.

Mohan Das U, Viswanath D, Azher U. Mohan Das U, et al. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 May;2(2):13-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1024. Epub 2009 Aug 26. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009. PMID: 25206106 Free PMC article. Review.

Asl Aminabadi N, Najafpour E, Erfanparast L, Samiei M, Haghifar M, Sighari Deljavan A, Jamali Z, Pournaghi Azar F, Shokravi M. Asl Aminabadi N, et al. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014 Spring;8(2):89-94. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2014.016. Epub 2014 Jun 11. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014. PMID: 25093052 Free PMC article.

Publication types

Comparative Study